Case Study 8 - How to reduce pension sharing by £68,000!
- Our client, Mr A approached us to assist with the division of pensions in his divorce.
- His pensions were significantly more valuable than Mrs A’s pensions on a cash equivalent transfer value (CETV) basis (£600,000 v £140,000).
- Mrs A’s existing IFA had put forward an approach whereby the division of the pensions would be done on a capital value
basis. i.e. £600,000 – £140,000 / 2 = £230,000.
- Therefore, Mrs A would receive a pension share of c.£230,000 or 38%.
- Mr A was concerned that this was too simplistic and unfair to him because his benefits were in personal pensions whilst Mrs A’s pension was final salary.
What We Did
- We reviewed the CETVs and ascertained that Mrs A’s pension was an NHS Pension.
- Their CETV calculations are on a single life basis.
- This undervalues the true pension benefits which are joint life benefits.
- In addition, providing like for like benefits for Mr A is expensive using his personal pension (He needs much more capital to
produce a similar income to Mrs A).
- We put forward equalising the pensions on an income basis as being a more fair approach to both.
- Mrs A’s IFA accepted the approach.
- He was able to negotiate a 27% pension share to be taken from his benefits or £162,000.
- Ultimately, he was able to retain a further £68,000 of his pension capital.
What Our Clients Say...
He delivered a thought provoking and eye opening session...I asked Phil to present at the Family Mediators Association Conference on Pension Freedoms within the context of divorce and financial settlements. He delivered a thought provoking and eye opening session full of ideas and case studies. The feedback I received from our delegates was extremely positive. If you are struggling with the challenges that pension freedoms throw up then Phil’s your man.
Do You Have A Question Related To This Case Study?
Use the form below to ask me anything about this case study. I promise that anything you say will be 100% confidential.